Improvements to erasure checking, fix to codegen issue

This commit is contained in:
2024-11-29 10:02:45 -08:00
parent 052bab81cb
commit 18e44cb7d3
18 changed files with 581 additions and 233 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
||| First pass of compilation
||| - work out arities and fully apply functions / constructors (currying)
||| - expand metas
||| currying is problemmatic because we need to insert lambdas (η-expand) and
||| it breaks all of the de Bruijn indices
||| - expand metas (this is happening earlier)
||| - erase stuff (there is another copy that essentially does the same thing)
||| I could make names unique (e.q. on lambdas), but I might want that to vary per backend?
module Lib.CompileExp
@@ -27,7 +30,9 @@ data CExp : Type where
CBnd : Nat -> CExp
CLam : Name -> CExp -> CExp
CFun : List Name -> CExp -> CExp
CApp : CExp -> List CExp -> CExp
-- REVIEW This feels like a hack, but if we put CLam here, the
-- deBruijn gets messed up in code gen
CApp : CExp -> List CExp -> Nat -> CExp
-- TODO make DCon/TCon app separate so we can specialize
-- U / Pi are compiled to type constructors
CCase : CExp -> List CAlt -> CExp
@@ -71,19 +76,21 @@ compileTerm : Tm -> M CExp
-- need to eta out extra args, fill in the rest of the apps
apply : CExp -> List CExp -> SnocList CExp -> Nat -> Tm -> M CExp
-- out of args, make one up (fix that last arg)
apply t [] acc (S k) ty = pure $
CLam "eta\{show k}" !(apply t [] (acc :< CBnd k) k ty)
apply t [] acc (S k) ty = pure $ CApp t (acc <>> []) (S k)
-- inserting Clam, index wrong?
-- CLam "eta\{show k}" !(apply t [] (acc :< CBnd k) k ty)
apply t (x :: xs) acc (S k) (Pi y str icit Zero a b) = apply t xs (acc :< CErased) k b
apply t (x :: xs) acc (S k) (Pi y str icit Many a b) = apply t xs (acc :< x) k b
-- see if there is anything we have to handle here
apply t (x :: xs) acc (S k) ty = error (getFC ty) "Expected pi \{showTm ty}"
apply t ts acc 0 ty = go (CApp t (acc <>> [])) ts
apply t (x :: xs) acc (S k) ty = error (getFC ty) "Expected pi \{showTm ty}. Overapplied function that escaped type checking?"
-- once we hit zero, we fold the rest
apply t ts acc 0 ty = go (CApp t (acc <>> []) Z) ts
where
go : CExp -> List CExp -> M CExp
-- drop zero arg call
go (CApp t []) args = go t args
go (CApp t [] Z) args = go t args
go t [] = pure t
go t (arg :: args) = go (CApp t [arg]) args
go t (arg :: args) = go (CApp t [arg] 0) args
-- apply : CExp -> List CExp -> SnocList CExp -> Nat -> M CExp
-- -- out of args, make one up
@@ -111,7 +118,7 @@ compileTerm (Lam _ nm t) = pure $ CLam nm !(compileTerm t)
compileTerm tm@(App _ _ _) with (funArgs tm)
_ | (Meta _ k, args) = do
-- this will be undefined, should only happen for use metas
pure $ CApp (CRef "Meta\{show k}") []
pure $ CApp (CRef "Meta\{show k}") [] Z
_ | (t@(Ref fc nm _), args) = do
args' <- traverse compileTerm args
arity <- arityForName fc nm
@@ -126,7 +133,7 @@ compileTerm tm@(App _ _ _) with (funArgs tm)
apply t' args' [<] 0 (U emptyFC)
-- error (getFC t) "Don't know how to apply \{showTm t}"
compileTerm (U _) = pure $ CRef "U"
compileTerm (Pi _ nm icit rig t u) = pure $ CApp (CRef "PiType") [ !(compileTerm t), CLam nm !(compileTerm u)]
compileTerm (Pi _ nm icit rig t u) = pure $ CApp (CRef "PiType") [ !(compileTerm t), CLam nm !(compileTerm u)] Z
compileTerm (Case _ t alts) = do
t' <- compileTerm t
alts' <- traverse (\case
@@ -137,6 +144,7 @@ compileTerm (Case _ t alts) = do
compileTerm (Lit _ lit) = pure $ CLit lit
compileTerm (Let _ nm t u) = pure $ CLet nm !(compileTerm t) !(compileTerm u)
compileTerm (LetRec _ nm t u) = pure $ CLetRec nm !(compileTerm t) !(compileTerm u)
compileTerm (Erased _) = pure CErased
export
compileFun : Tm -> M CExp