I think I have case expressions compiling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ data Maybe : U -> U where
|
||||
Just : {a : U} -> a -> Maybe a
|
||||
Nothing : {a : U} -> Maybe a
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
-- forward declaration
|
||||
Val : U
|
||||
|
||||
data Tm : U where
|
||||
@@ -61,11 +65,38 @@ cApp (MkClosure env t) u = eval (Define env u) t
|
||||
|
||||
hole : Val
|
||||
|
||||
eval env (Var x) =
|
||||
case lookup env x of
|
||||
-- TODO need to inline solved metas somewhere, as error messages are unreadable
|
||||
-- NEXT fix FC for missing case if we remove _
|
||||
|
||||
eval env tm = case tm of
|
||||
(Var x) =>
|
||||
case lookup env x of
|
||||
-- case doesn't use the new code. We've got a wildcard here that
|
||||
-- is forced to {Val}, but we don't have forcing/dotting
|
||||
-- I guess we see what Jesper says about dotting
|
||||
Just x => x
|
||||
Nothing => VVar x
|
||||
eval env _ = hole
|
||||
-- TODO no tupls yet
|
||||
App t u => case eval env t of
|
||||
VLam t => cApp t (eval env u)
|
||||
t => VApp t (eval env u)
|
||||
Lam t => VLam (MkClosure env t)
|
||||
Let t u => eval (Define env (eval env t)) u
|
||||
-- NEXT this is unreachable, find out how to warn about it
|
||||
-- _ => hole
|
||||
|
||||
lvl2ix : Nat -> Nat -> Nat
|
||||
lvl2ix (S k) (S j) = lvl2ix k j
|
||||
lvl2ix Z (S j) = j
|
||||
lvl2ix _ Z = Z -- shouldn't happen
|
||||
|
||||
quote : Nat -> Val -> Tm
|
||||
quote l v = case v of
|
||||
VVar x => Var (lvl2ix l x)
|
||||
VApp t u => App (quote l t) (quote l u)
|
||||
VLam t => Lam (quote (S l) (cApp t (VVar l)))
|
||||
|
||||
nf : Env -> Tm -> Tm
|
||||
nf env t = quote (length env) (eval env t)
|
||||
|
||||
-- and then a parser / example
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user